The story of Ray Bradbury "Rust": summary and analysis

click fraud protection

works of genius are always bang their heads supporters of different opinions, forcing the reader to support and hating one side.It acts as Ray Bradbury story "Rust", a summary of which is not capable of without the quotes to convey the passions.

appears omniscient author, but cool-headed dialogue witnessed two military men.One of them - the soldier to the bone, and the other - the sergeant by chance, the boy who no longer want war and lives most of us.It is best to read this work entirely by spending ten minutes, rather than seek a brief retelling of "Rust" Bradbury story with deep psychological context with which reveals the true mastery of science fiction.

What tells "rust"?

Sergeant Hollis, smart but troubled inner dilemma of a young man comes to talk with the colonel.Until he heard rumors about unimportant mental well-being of the soldier.However, the conversation gets an unexpected twist.Hollis rejected a proposal to transfer to another district, refuses to participate in hostilities, he does not want more wars.Moreover, the sergeant puts fantastic assumption that one day, all weapons will disappear from the face of the earth.Colonel responds to suggestions cynicism war: the battle will not stop ever.People naked fists float teeth and claws like beasts, but will never be able to abandon confrontation.Sergeant responds to this scathing attack, he had invented a device that causes "nervous shock" at the armory steel and turns it into rust.The conclusion is clear - the military needs a doctor.Colonel takes a pen from his pocket with a cap from the cartridge to give Hollis referral, indicating he did not believe a word of it.It fills the sergeant who a month pondering the fate of the weapons, determination.Hollis said that will take advantage of holiday and out of the camp for a few minutes, say goodbye to superiors and leaves the room.Some time later, the colonel begins to discuss the state of the sergeant on the phone with the doctor and going to make a mark with a pen cap of a rifle cartridge, is only a red dust ... rust.He immediately calling hours and without hesitation ordered to catch up and shoot Hollis.But he can not comply with the order.No one else can use the weapon.Breaking the wall of a chair leg and arm strong, Colonel rushes in pursuit of the main culprit, encroached on the dictatorship of weapons.Hurtling like primitive man, devoid of intelligence.

psychological portraits of characters

Mixing idealism and realism - is the main motif on which to build a story of Ray Bradbury's "rust."Summary, unfortunately, does not pass the changes taking place with the characters.Hollis - open person, a dreamer and an idealist who is used to tell the truth.Although it looks a bit naive, addressing his words to the ideological enemy - Colonel, fed and nourished by the war.Behavior change officer for the story.First Colonel expresses sympathy, and then shouted: "Kill!" It's simple: inside says the fear of losing jobs, the meaning of life.

What the author wanted to say?

Trying to convey the essence of the conflict through dialogue, in the end, the narrator goes on to describe.Colorful.Brutal.Realistic.He begins to speak the language of psychological images that permeate the story of Ray Bradbury's "rust."Summary might look like this: to reveal the true character of a person, you need to show him the dreams of others.Fight for the sake of war or live without war.Two points of view are far removed from the present state of things, they are at opposite ends.Dreamer eliminates weapons, bloodthirsty hunter makes it improvised.That's what says Ray Bradbury.Rust - is, above all, the illusion of an impossible dream.

Perhaps the author wrote a message to people that need to make a better world, and to come up with this sergeant-builder.In contrast, he portrayed the antihero - stale pragmatist living standards.Yes, the story of Ray Bradbury "Rust", a summary of which is a retelling of the dreams of a world without war can be interpreted in two ways.But most likely, the author, being a dreamer and inventor of the present anti-weapons destroyed his own idea and said that the war will always be.And it does not need guns and bombs.