Few people know, but in the XIX century, enlightened Europe were made several times attempt to debunk the myth of Napoleon.Allegedly, this is actually a character in the history of the world has never existed, and all the historical events with him are illusory and are the result of mass hypnosis.
the first time questioned the existence of Napoleon Bonaparte English philosopher Richard Uetli in 1819, ie at a time when, according to the "myth" Napoleon was still alive.British treatise called "Historic doubts relative to Napoleon Bonaparte" (trans. - "Historical doubts about Napoleon Bonaparte").In his satirical apology, pamphlet he proved using the method of the mythological school that Napoleon never existed, that his whole existence just a hoax, based on confusing the legend, controversial battles and the habit of people to make each silhouette in the distance in a cap-cocked for the emperor ...
Treatise Uetli enjoyed some success, particularly thanks to him, and he became even as a significant figure, known in narrow circles and in our days.
Eight years later, he saw the light of another scientific publication on "myth" of Napoleon.French physicist and mathematician Jean-Baptiste Peres issued a pamphlet entitled "Comme quoi Napoléon n'a jamais existé ou Grand Erratum, source d'un nombre infini d'errata à noter dans l'histoire du XIXe siècle" ("Why Napoleon neverexisted, or a great mistake - the source of an infinite number of errors that should be noted in the history of the XIX century. ").In the Russian language scientific treatise was translated in 1912.
In his paper, Professor of Mathematics, University of Lyon and physicist proved that Napoleon actually never existed, that he was a mirage of the XIX century, "solar myth" and a result of mass hypnosis.Evidence scientist was strictly scientific.Perez singled in the life of Napoleon nine main characteristics, including its name, place of birth, mother's name, the number of brothers and sisters, they inhibition of the French Revolution, the number of marshals and the number of years of his reign.A detailed analysis of these dates has led professors to the conclusion that in fact, Napoleon never had it - just a symbol of the sun.
Articles Source: reyfman.wordpress.com
