Hypothesis of the origin of man: the evolution of views

click fraud protection

In all ages, starting from the ancient times until today, humanity worried about his own origins.During this period there was a considerable number of theories, opinions range, sometimes diametrically opposed, the hypothesis of the origin of man.The majority of them are not built on clear evidence, but rather on the intuitive assumptions, supported occasionally by various historical or anthropological factors.In doing so, the hypothesis can not be called come from nowhere - their occurrence in a given historical period, and it is logical due to the progress of science.

main hypothesis of the origin of man as an illustration of the development of scientific thought

Initially people, faced with a highly nature around him and realized that he was more than fit harmoniously into the surrounding world, surpassing, however, other forms of life on the mental development,He attributed the origin of all living things divine powers.Almost all religions as valid today, and gone away with the civilizations of antiquity, the origin of life on Earth is the only merit of the gods.In some religions, man was made from a piece of clay, in the other is the direct descendant of the gods, but somehow life on our planet was explained by supernatural intervention.These hypotheses about the origin of man received the name of creationism in science, that is the theory of creation.

These hypotheses functioned as the only reasonable explanation for the appearance of a man for a long time - as long as the development of science has not reached the stage when it became apparent link between human beings and other life forms on Earth.And explain this relationship outside interference is not possible.So there was an evolutionary theory of the origin of man.The date of its origin is considered to be 1739 - in this year's natural scientist and anthropologist Carl Linnaeus introduced the classification of primates and contemporary person, designating it as Homo Sapiens.

Later this theory has developed and consolidated, Charles Darwin, whose name it is associated today.Proponents of the hypothesis of human origins argue that modern humans - the logical conclusion of primate evolution, which gradually, under the influence of natural disasters, as well as by the process of natural selection have reached this level of development.In support of this theory are numerous data historical and anthropological studies confirming the fact that monkeys certainly evolved in its development, and gradually came to the humanoid life forms.Unfortunately, no direct evidence of this theory is not, that is, to trace the evolutionary chain is impossible, just as it is impossible to explain why some monkeys and remained at the level of animals.But this theory still remains the official and most modern classical scholars - the adherents of this particular hypothesis of human origins.

But in recent decades, from about the second half of the last century, in contrast to the classical theories of the evolution of humanity - the religious and scientific, and others began to appear.The most common of them - this explanation of the appearance of man on the planet under the influence (or direct participation) of extraterrestrial civilizations.The rapid development of outer space, recurrent speculation about the existence of other civilizations, perhaps significantly exceed Earth in its development and inexplicable from the standpoint of modern science, the facts have led to the hypothesis that modern human origins deny previous scientific experience.

paleovisit theorists argue that monkeys have remained dead end, not led to the creation of the mind, and modern forms of life have been introduced from the outside more advanced beings.