What ideology negates the principle of separation of powers?

What ideology negates the principle of separation of powers?The answer to this question can give each person and the student who knows the history of his country.All the people who lived in Soviet times, without difficulty be able to answer this question, because they lived at a time when the separation of powers was not recognized.

What is the principle, which is based on the separation of powers?What ideology negates the principle of separation of powers?

answer to this question can be given much more quickly if you understand what is the meaning of this principle.

Thus, the separation of powers is that legislative activity in the country should be carried out by the legislature, executive and administrative - executive and judicial activities - the courts.At the same time all the bodies are separate, relatively independent and beyond the control of each other.

The separation of powers is that all authority in the state were distributed to all state.authorities.This is done in order to prevent the concentration of all powers in one authority, thus avoiding arbitrariness and unfairness in the state.

know the answer to this question, each becomes much clearer what ideology negates the principle of separation of powers.

the Soviet Union and the principle of acting in the republic

probably almost everyone will be able to answer this question: what ideology negates the principle of separation of powers.

state representative bodies.Soviet power is the Council.It is their sovereignty and characterized Soviet republic.According to the Basic Law it belonged all power to the Soviets.It should be noted that all the other organs under the control of the Soviets.

must be said that the Soviet Republic was built on the principle of democratic centralism.Parliament in the USSR was not: all of its functions carried out by the Soviets and their chambers.

also important that in the Soviet Republic there was no division between local governments and state agencies.power.The latter concept in theory and practice, the Soviet Union was not.

Based on the foregoing, the answer, what ideology negates the principle of separation of powers.It was the Communist Party did not support the principle, since the republic was built on the principle of democratic centralism.In the Soviet Union there was no legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the post-Soviet states.

Soviets in the USSR

Tips - a representative government, who were chosen by the population for a certain period.They were absolute authority.Tips were both presentable and regulatory, supervisory and regulatory authorities.

All powers performed the Soviets themselves or bodies that they have created.It should be noted that absolutely all bodies operating in the Soviet Union were controlled by the Soviets.

existed in the Soviet republic Councils of higher and lower levels, however, the fundamental and substantial differences between them were not, but were controlled by a higher downstream.It is important that the Soviets could be recalled by his own electorate at any time.

Knowing the system of government of the USSR, it is possible to answer the question, what ideology negates the principle of separation of powers.

Liberal Party.What principle is it supported?

Many people who lived in the Soviet Union, know what ideology negates the principle of separation of powers.The Liberal Party was of the opinion that the main task of the state - to free people from poverty, prevention of discrimination, dishonesty and ignorance.First of all, the Liberals proclaimed rights and freedoms of all people the highest value.They were of the view that the economy does not have to be fully concentrated in the hands of public bodies: the liberals sought to free market economy.You also need to say that the Liberals were fighting for civil rights, and strive to the absolute equality of all citizens before the law.

important to note that the main principle of the liberals was to limit state.power, but they supported the separation of powers, and thought it was a sign of true democracy.Those who supported the Liberals believed that the freedoms and rights of citizens - is the most important thing.The state apparatus and the basic principle of power to the liberals retreated to second place, after the man, his rights, freedoms and integrity.

Communist Party

Many people are easy to answer the question, what ideology negates the principle of separation of powers.The Communist Party has denied this principle, because I think that the Council should be the only body of state.power, which fulfills all the powers.Communists believe that the principle of separation of powers is wrong, as opposed to the principle of democratic centralism - he was the main principle of the Communist Party.

Everyone who knows and understands the principles of various ideologies, knows exactly what is denied the separation of powers.It was the Communist Party believes that the state should not adhere to this principle.Communists believe that the government should be in the hands of the Soviets, and they should be the sole authority.