Alex Slyusarenko - Lugansk Pop Gapon

click fraud protection

Recent events associated with the priest Alexei Slyusarenko forced me to write this short article.Especially interested in becoming Sergey Pavlyuchenko "Alex Slyusarenko - a priest and a provocateur» (http://www.newsland.ru/news/detail/id/985910/).The first and most important thing that catches the eye - it's love to the priest homily of other persons.Alex Slyusarenko obviously can not ignore any more or less significant fact and not say about a few words.Despite the fact that as a scientist father Alexei was only enough for one thin book that is already causing as many questions than the provocative activities of the priest, he regularly gives interviews to the local media Luhansk.

own books, regular interviews, teaching various famous people, including doctors of sciences - in the words of the priest-Lugansk "narcissism Amazing!" But back to teaching.A priest, ordained only 3 years ago, in May 2009, taken the right and left doctors of theology to condemn and blame the whole theological academy, besides - is a member of RATSIRS.Not much there for the young priest?And since so much of his "duty" - when he has time to serve?

It is evident that the actions of a priest Alexei Slyusarenko not just purposeful - they are also very skillfully coordinated.In light of his statements it can confidently say that these actions are directed against the representatives of the Moscow Patriarchate in Ukraine, especially against the strongest secular and theological schools.This is the way of separation of church schism.Alex Slyusarenko priest and a group of his associates seek autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church on a national basis, engaged in discrediting the "Muscovites" in the moment.

But disruptive, splitting activities within the church can not meet the sacred dignity!Priest Alexey Slyusarenko commit villainy as a public figure and the grave sin of "seducing little ones" among the One Body of Christ, trying to artificially impose among Orthodox Christians, non-existent contradictions.He likened the priest Gapon, incited the crowd to active operations against the Tsar a early twentieth century, which led eventually to the spectacular destruction and troubles.What good can come from the actions of the priest Gapon sample of the XXI century?

In conclusion, I would like to add a few words: after a short period of time "nice" way Gapon priest ended tragically - he was strangled with a rope and hung on a hook on the wall of a roadside house, he was punished for having acted against the unity of Russia.What will happen to those who opposed the unity of the Church?