Self-defense is the civil rights acts that are aimed at protection of property or personal rights (of its own, other people or their state).Such measures shall not be prohibited by law;they are limited by rules of law.These include acts committed for the protection of property, as well as those needed for self-defense, force absolutely necessary.These measures should not infringe on anyone's rights and interests, or would otherwise have to compensate for the damage that was caused by their use.On the other hand, if the defender in a hazard to property, life, health, any action that causes harm to the offender, it is legitimate.In this case, we are talking about the measures taken in case of emergency.
Self-defense of civil rights include actions aimed at stopping offenses.Their legality and legitimacy is determined by the Civil Code, including the twelfth and fourteenth articles of the Civil Code.
Self-defense of civil rights includes such a thing as self-defense.If in this case the injured attacker (the offender), he does not have to be reimbursed.But only if the necessary self-limits are not exceeded.This aspect is not just lead to legal disputes.What you need to recognize the appropriateness of a particular method of self-defense?To action defending considered lawful, necessary to prove that the attack was real and illegal.Self-defense of civil rights in this case will be recognized, if not exceeded its limits.Untimely application protection - not in favor of the defender.Not every illegal behavior requires reciprocal defense.Self-defense on the street should be commensurate with the attack - in other words, it is directed only to repel the attack, protect property, life and health of their own, their relatives and other people not to be aimed at the punishment of the offender.Yet even in this case the victim's assault on any legitimate interests of the defending should be taken into account as a mitigating circumstance.The legal consequence of self-defense should be no compensation for the damage caused to the aggressor.
right to self-defense includes actions taken during an emergency.Such measures may be directed to eliminate the danger to any third party, and even most pests.The need for such action to be justified by the lack of any other way to prevent trouble.At the same time the damage caused should not be higher than the one that was averted.If any person who has committed actions aimed at self-defense, has exceeded the limits of necessary self-defense, it must compensate for the damage.
to have a gun for self-defense, it is necessary to obtain a license for its acquisition in the police department.
Further measures necessary for the protection of certain rights, including property, must not conflict with legal requirements.For example, it is legitimate to use many kinds of security devices - locks, alarm and so on. However, there have been instances of traps or fences, fenced with barbed wire under electric voltage, to protect against thieves.Obvious illegality of the use of such means, because they are directed not only to the protection of property, but also in personal injury and a lifetime opportunity offender, and not only the offender, but also law-abiding persons who may, acting recklessly affected by the use of such funds.If the use of such techniques has brought damage to anyone, he should be compensated.And in this case it is also that the self-defense of civil rights should not be exceeded.
