The privatization of apartments pros and cons, whether it is necessary - privatization?

click fraud protection

privatization of apartments is a free transfer to the joint overall, as well as fractional common ownership of property to those who were registered in the apartment (house), provided that these same persons had never privatized housing.As in all other areas, privatization of apartments pros and cons has to carry out the privatization process can be independently or through special agencies.With self process a person can save much more, but it will take a lot of time.But if you seek the services of real estate companies, privatization will take less time, but the service will need to pay.This is the privatization of apartments pros and cons .

can consider to start only positive side to this process .:

- after the procedure goes completely flat in the property owner (s) of the property may be disposed of at will - sell, donate, bequeath or otherwise.

- if a person takes a loan, and he needs a mortgage, then privatization can perfectly flat in this approach.In addition, privatization apartment can be the key to a third party with the consent of the owner.

- the law only privatization apartment can be inherited or the death of the owners of the new law, which are specified in the will.

That is why the privatization of the apartment is favorable to the heirs and businesses.Thus the privatization of apartments pros and cons - for someone of great importance, and for someone completely worthless.

consider the disadvantages of privatization:

- if privatize communal apartment or a room in a dormitory, for example, privatization of state property , in which the state was once owned and then provide current living people, then there are some minuses.Estimates show that real estate companies, such transactions account for about 20% of the entire market segment.Thus, buying and selling of communal apartments or dorm room is not in demand.If such property is privatized, it will be a difficult sell.

- people who are alone, poor and have no heirs, the privatization of apartments only hurt.The fact that homeowners are required to pay tax on apartment privatization, and not cheap to pay utility bills and make their own repairs.People who are heirs, it is advantageous to carry out privatization, but those who have not, privatization will only further burden.Note that the people who live in apartments on social hiring of a special agreement, all of the above losses spared.

Thus, privatization of apartments pros and cons of a , but if a person living in privatized apartments, it is partially exempted from payment of expensive public services received subsidies to pay for their housing and repair facilities (roof, basement, facade)will be carried out is not the owners of property, and the state.

Recall that from March 1 last year, free privatization of public housing over .From the time when privatization was just hype, people soon sought to transfer the ownership of his apartment, a lot has changed.Of course, there were many transactions in which people have privatized their possessions, but it was a lot of reverse transactions, the so-called - de-privatization of housing.It all depends on the personal preferences of the person - he wants to privatize the apartment or not.But in any case, you should consult with a competent lawyer who will certainly tell right solution for each individual owner.