In the late 1920s - early 1930s in the Soviet Union at the initiative of the CPSU (b) held mass collectivization in rural areas.The process of collectivization and the establishment of large-scale agricultural enterprises of the socialist type hindered by the lack of material and technical base in the countryside.The peasants were not interested in working for the state, which uses the physical labor of people not allowing for that little or no payment.
What is MTS in the USSR?
In 1929, 15 party congress analyzed the situation in the country's agriculture.The party leadership has once again stressed that in rural areas it is necessary to create a large agricultural production, so that the city was provided with bread, cereals and other products.Realizing that the state should provide the newly created collective enterprises technique to reduce the share of non-mechanized production processes, Stalin praised the work of First MTS.By the way, what is abbrevatury MTS decoding?The Soviet Union created a machine and tractor stations, which are called abbreviated MTS.
History and development of the MTS
first machine and tractor station in the Soviet Union was established in 1927.Place of origin - Shevchenkovo village of Odessa region, Ukraine.By the way, it is no coincidence, because the Odessa region has always been famous for an abundance of rationalization ideas that almost immediately after the implementation showed to be effective and produce real tangible result.In the above-mentioned convention party positively assessed the activities of the first Soviet MTS.
Stalin seen in the development of the network and tractor stations one of the foundations of the party implementing the concept of collectivization in agriculture.The task set before the Congress leaders of the agricultural direction was active coverage of SRT tractor equipment throughout the country.Many party officials in person (had a tour) to see what MTS.In the USSR the number of such enterprises in 1931 was already 1228. Since the pace of collectivization grew (in 1932 - the peak of the formation of collective farms), it was necessary to create a new technical enterprise.Analyzing the statistics on 1933, we see an increase in the number of MTS more than doubled (up to 2886), and in 1934 the government has opened about 500 stations.At the party leadership I am also not going to stop, so was given another task.In 1937 (and we all know what that time), the number of stations was to make 6000. Of course, the result has been achieved, because in the years of mass repression and the failure heyday denunciations Party directives are often punished camps or shot.
order of interaction of MTS and collective farms
What is MTS in the USSR for the collective farms themselves?Each farm leaders also saw the need for mechanization of labor, because it leads to an increase in labor productivity and crop yields.Not having its own equipment, farms in the face of MTS saw support from the state.
how to organize cooperation?Machine and tractor stations owned equipment, the production of which is also constantly growing.Tractors, combines and other equipment provided to collective farms for rent.Collective pay the cost of renting equipment MTS by the money received for the delivery of the crop to the state.In the event of a breakdown of tractors, combines, seeders mechanics MTS call came to the farm, inspected and repaired its equipment.
political aspect of MTS
In 1930 any economic activity was directly related to the political situation.Each tractor station worked Political Department, headed by deputy director for political work.The Division was to guide Party organizations attached to the MTS and its farms.Responsibility for the high-quality work carried MTS not only the director, but also the political department.This is not surprising, because any failure of the economic mechanism in those years was regarded as sabotage, but it was already on the political part.
What is MTS in the Soviet Union, and now we hope is clear to all.Without the technical basis for collectivization, most likely, it would have been impossible.
