That comes to an end of a college education.Almost ended relatively carefree student days, put all session state exams.It is time to defend his is chief scientific work.To a large extent on how well will be drawn up a review of the thesis will depend on the extent to which it graciously accept the commission.We offer to understand how to properly prepare and issue the document.
Content
We will not hide - often members of the department instruct students to write a review on their own thesis.Perhaps we will not understand how it is competent - this is not the topic of this article - and try to tell that should contain this document into practice.First of all, to define its purpose.Review of the thesis is an evaluation of an independent expert, which reflects how much the student has mastered the stated topic, and what is the value of his work.In other words, the identification and study of strengths and weaknesses.An important rule - in any case not to use the common phrase.The text should be clear, concise, and the opinion expressed in it - justified.
structure
Review head on a thesis must contain the following compulsory blocks:
- confirmation or refutation of relevance to the protection provided by the subject;
- characteristic style of writing, compliance with the applicable work standards applied to the content, assessment literacy;
- brief analysis of each section of the diploma and its evaluation;
- allocation of non-standard solutions and methods, examples of creative thinking of students, his erudition;
- assess the practical relevance of scientific work;
- shortcomings of the thesis;
- and finally recommended, based on all of the above, the evaluation.
Making
In each university can have its standards governing the design.In that case, if not, a review of the thesis is written on the basis of common rules.Here they are:
- scope of the document is not regulated and is determined by common sense and is usually 1 to 1.5 pages.Do not try to make it extensive, but do not forget that the basic idea should be disclosed;
- necessarily in the header listing basic information: name of the theme, faculty, department, group, specialty, name of the student, the group number;
- document must contain references to the company, based on which is written qualification work;
- be strictly structured text (exemplary structure described in the previous paragraph);
- review of the thesis involves the conclusion of an evaluation, which it deserves a 4-point scale: excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory.
Despite the fact that at present the content and design of this document does not impose such stringent requirements as before, if you want to be sure of a positive result, then consider all possible aspects, and good luck with your protection!
