review of the supervisor is important in any case.But it is especially necessary if you want to assess the level of implementation of different kinds of research.If the student's work is available on any competition, the list of papers accompanying the review takes the first place, along with reviews and acts of implementation.The importance of this document, no one doubts.After all, only the head of research can adequately assess the degree of involvement of the nominee for a particular academic award to conduct research and evaluate the personal qualities of the applicant.
review of the supervisor is written in an arbitrary manner, but it must be reflected the main points.In the beginning, written on whose work it is given, is certainly the name of work.Most often, the above-mentioned text takes the form of a header and bold.Then goes directly to the text of the document, the contents of which, by definition, must be positive.It makes no sense to provide work for the competition, in which even the head there are serious comments.Before proceeding to the description of the document, the manager must characterize its author, noting the tendency of its research activities, make independent decisions, the ability to work independently with literature.Review of the supervisor should also include a list of what the student has done and what results could achieve.This will help the referee make a presentation on its work and its scientific potential.It would therefore be a good idea if the head will describe possible applications of the results.Especially worth noting the presence of acts of implementation, if they have the nominee.
review of the supervisor on the thesis has a title similar to that described above, but the main text often begins with the words that the applicant is engaged in scientific research work degree from college and for all time has proved to be extremely educated and erudite man.It then identifies other positive qualities of the applicant.The head should also be noted, which is dedicated to the thesis, however theoretical and experimental studies involved the author, what results from a scientific point of view, he was able to achieve.Considering that this scientific work is individual, it is worth noting that all supplied as part of the research problems were solved by the applicant independently.Equally important is the extent of publication of the results.It is necessary to specify how many conference was attended by the author of the work, it is worth noting the number of published articles, abstracts, reports.At the end of the revocation scientific supervisor must be noted that the applicant should be awarded a degree in a chosen specialty.
Reviewed head on the thesis begins similarly, and should include an evaluation of the result of activity of graduates.It is worth noting that the student knows how to use literature and is able to solve any set tasks.It should be noted that it was necessary to do in the diploma project and a way to solve this problem the author chose a diploma.
Thus, any review of the supervisor must describe the work itself, achievements and future directions for further research.Also, it is necessary to characterize the author, as a promising scholar, able to carry out various research works on their own.
