With the advent of democracy, the principles on which it was based, began to dominate in all areas of human life.Good or bad - it is still to be seen.The housing issue also fell under a new time in which a person determines that he needs to act as an intelligent.The older generation does not think about that sometime become owners of their homes, as the possession, use and disposal of implied without confirming the status of the property.In the early 90-ies of the last century, with the advent of the democratic parties, it was decided to give freedom and declare that every citizen has the right to act as the owner of any premises, enterprise, and finally the apartment.
Initially everyone liked the idea.And there was a general privatization.Having the ownership of their apartments, many people later regret their step, as the owner of the obligations lie on the content of housing and the surrounding area, which previously lay in state bodies.Dye entrances, cleaning the site, change the bulbs on the floors - all this fell on the shoulders of the new owners.
subsided Once the first wave of privatization, the people who want to become owners of their apartments, markedly diminished.The authorities, seeing this situation, we decided that the extension of the privatization will be able to push people to action.The TV started to broadcast the information at the request of citizens who wanted to but could not privatize their housing and become its owner, the government adopted a decree on the extension of the privatization of housing.It was decided that it will end in January 2007.
I must say that this perseverance authorities remained unanswered.People lined up again in the endless queue for the certificates for registration of documents.Extending the privatization was another step in the transfer of responsibilities of the state owners.According to the results, which was summed up by the State Duma in the last winter session in December 2007, the results were significant, but were not satisfactory character.It remained about 20% of the population of the Russian Federation, who did not want or did not have time to privatize their housing.The question was whether to again venturing extension of privatization, and whether the problem is solved with the remaining 20%.
debate in the media and public authorities did not cease.Each in his own way sought to convince or, conversely, to discourage people from privatization.The controversy led to the fact that the extension of privatization still held.It was named in 2015, which is to finish all the actions that are associated with a free registration to the ownership of property.After that, a frustrated landlord can only through the sale of the state to buy their homes at the property.
State Duma emphasized that the extension of the privatization will no longer be on the agenda.This is the final deadline, which should put an end to many years of coaxing the population.
