If you are a celebrity, then your unwanted companions will certainly become paparazzi.This freelance journalists, who earn by selling pictures of stars of the screen, politics, sports and other spheres of life, the characters which cause the keen interest of the public.
forgotten about ethics
meaning of the word "paparazzi" always painted negative semantics, because the way that photographers are tireless, tactless and immoral.They can sit for hours in the "ambush", to snatch the camera lenses tidbits personal life of a famous person.Of course, these pictures are taken without the knowledge and consent of the characters.
origin of the word
Where did this word, the sound of which hints at the meaning of the profession?In 1960, the famous Italian film director Federico Fellini created a film called "Sweet Life", one of the heroes of which was ever-present correspondent photographer by the name of the paparazzi.The director gave this character all the features possessed by nosy and meddlesome journalist hunting for sensation.This word has a phonetic similarity with the Sicilian name of a mosquito.According to Fellini, the paparazzi (plural - paparazzi) - it is something like an insect buzzing burdensomely who swiftly swoops down, hangs over you, and then stings.Maitre even painted the paparazzi, whose appearance resembles unpleasant curved shape, from which emanates unscrupulousness and impudence.
Fellini's film made a household name of paparazzi photos.The word has become a plural form and became a symbol of a journalist chasing "hot" facts and ambiguous scenes.For the first time in such value token used the American magazine "Time", and the term spread quickly through the pages of other publications.
There were newspapers and magazines, bet on materials paparazzi.It was a publication focused on the scandalous stories from the life of stars.After some time, they were joined by this kind of TV shows.
What is the difference between journalists and paparazzi
paparazzi camera lens is often likened to a gun muzzle from which sensation-hungry photographers "shoot" in celebrities, convicting or compromising them, thereby distorting their lives.The difference between the journalist and the paparazzi are so great that those words did not synonymous.The first carries out a fair impartial investigation in order to triumph the truth and the law.He does not have anything to do with being "adhered" to the peephole camera and hid in the bushes, in order to capture not available to the public the details of the intimate life of the well-known person, and then rip this large sum.
But what about the law?
On the one hand, the law protects the individual's right to privacy, on the other - there is freedom of the press.Many paparazzi are violations to get what they want, they can pretend to be other people cheat, enter on private land, forge documents and appearance.Their main argument is that public people make choices in favor of their whole life was in sight, it is, after all, the way of their earnings and the condition of popularity.In their view, the relationship show-business stars and paparazzi - a mutual unspoken agreement that they feed each other.
Indeed, celebrities would not be such if their faces and details of private life did not flash in the press, however, and they have a right to privacy, as well as all other people.
Who is to blame for the fact that there are paparazzi?
Demand creates supply.As long as there are people with an interest flipping the yellow press, will correspondents obsequiously throws "strawberry".Few disgust throw myself newspaper in which flicker is sensational picture stars after unsuccessful plastic surgery, then backhanded shot lovemaking respected person.Most of us are interested in, and will be considered unsightly ethically pictures.People are curious.And who are the paparazzi in this case, not of demand commodity traders?
