people constantly exchange views.So the world works.He is said to have each his own.To bring closer the boundaries of representations on specific issues, it is necessary to explain what is meant by this or that definition, concept, fact.After all, everyone sees something different! In severe cases, to correct views or simply an exchange of views are used the dispute, discussion, debate.How do they differ from each other?In some cases, resorted to a particular type of relationship?Let's deal.
dispute with special conditions
to start to find out what the controversy.This will help to dictionaries.Explanatory publications unambiguous.Controversy they characterize as a kind of dispute, in which the opponents or the sides and arguments in detail express their point of view.It's not just transfer phrases.It is a number of serious speeches, which are carefully prepared, documented factual materials have logic.Such, for example, the scientific controversy.Such a dispute could last for years, as to clarify the truth you need to collect a lot of data and reflect, learn from them sequences, which are then made into the theory and so on.
It is clear that the purpose of controversy - not just to convince his interlocutor.No.As a result of the efforts of two or more parties to be born is an opinion which will take into account all the views and thoughts, that is closer to the truth of the participants of the event.It turns out that to argue that such a debate must take into account a lot of views and opinions, to study tactics and strategy, understand the origins of its occurrence.
little history
Art controversy was known in ancient Greece.This great philosopher as Zenon even classify its types.He believed that the dispute can be conducted with different objectives.If a person wanted to convince your opponent, it's a tactic called open palm.When the same goal - to beat the counterpart is "clenched fist".It is understood that the techniques of these discussions were different.It is significant that even in ancient times were tested a variety of tactics.The fact that such a debate, was known in ancient China.Although the methods of the inhabitants of the Middle Kingdom in general, very different from the Greek.Nevertheless, the Chinese believed that the art of controversy should be taught, not allowing that opponents fell to the scandals.
Modern looks and rules
Currently, the art of polemics paid much attention.We can say that a lack of understanding of its methods of reference and specific rules is considered bad manners.The education required to explain what the controversy.This is accepted in the scientific world, economic schools, places of training future journalists, workers of culture and art.Start with the person with whom and in what cases you can argue.There are very specific conditions.So, you can not get into an argument on the subject, in which people are incompetent.This is logical.For conducting the controversy must be a thorough knowledge of the subject, his ability to convey to the listener arguments, accessible, understandable.
personal attitude towards the controversy
Perhaps most important in the art of the dispute is the ability to control their emotions.One of the first rules that govern the "correct" the controversy is the following: do not engage in a discussion with people who evince hostility to the speaker or to the subject under discussion.This is understandable.Such talk would resemble a scandal, even if held at the highest cultural level.In addition, there are cases when the opponent comes into the debate, not wanting to hear a different opinion.His goal - to bring its public.Oppose this - grist to his mill.So do not always rational.We need to begin to understand the position of the opponent.The art of polemics - great skill.He must consciously learn to skillfully applied in life.
