Society and nature - it is a certain symbiosis, and the public is still owned by parasitic role, because initially people come all ready.Nature for many billions of years older than even the oldest human ancestor.Miraculously organized system of interaction between living things and did not want to gross interference by the reasonable subject.
Initially, like all living things, man is part of nature.But at some point he singled himself out of it.Not then whether it happened when he picked up a stick to make a living?But the monkeys use simple tools, thanks to the structure of the limbs and the rudiments of thinking, but we can not say that they alter the nature.Apparently, once so ancient people behaved.While ordinary ape - a dead end, so do not expect that sometime in the same way will be a new form of Homo Sapiens.Current primates in the eyes of man - also a part of the natural environment.
In general, we can talk about nature in two ways.In a broad sense it is - the phenomenon of the philosophical essence of something.Narrower concept determines its nature and all processes running in it as the natural environment.Whether the wind is blowing, whether rain, whether the plant blooms, whether born baby animal - all the phenomena of nature as a living and nonliving.When it comes to the relationship "society and nature", it is understood in the narrow sense
opposition to it, so if a person denies the biological entity.Perhaps this is rational.Animals act by instinct, then as a member of a civilized society can not afford such a "luxury."There is an authoritative opinion that a person, suppressing natural desires, becomes neurosis and other mental disorders.Many immoral deeds explained the call of nature.So how does a person separated from nature?Does he have the right to oppose itself to the natural environment?Society too has assumed the nature, forgetting that it depends on it.
capacious phrase "Nature - not a temple but a workshop," reflects consumer relationship of humanity to the natural environment.Society and nature can coexist in harmony, only if there is a rethinking of values at the level of the whole society and each individual.At the global level, the pollution of air and water, the destruction of a huge number of animals, the depletion of resources.At the level of a particular person - a garbage dump in the woods after a picnic, pouring waste into rivers and lakes, hunting is prohibited.
Some argue that society and benefit nature brings.Rare species of animals and plants listed in the Red Book, are carefully protected from extinction;dry and cut down old trees, to give life to the young;assisted whales washed ashore.But such is it really help?Firstly, many of the problems are caused just by human activity, and secondly, the nature itself knows how it will be better for it, because it has a mind (not in the usual sense of the person, and in a different, intuitive).Naturally, without human intervention, we are dying, and there are new kinds of living organisms, to regulate the number of animals, natural selection leaves a strong and healthy individuals.Society and nature will never be able to blend in so perfectly how nature itself is perfect.
Civilization is not in place, the development pace is grandiose.It is difficult to say what will happen to humanity in the coming century, and even decades.Assuming the most optimistic scenario, that a global catastrophe will pass Earth, that people come to their senses and stop destroying the world, there will be problems of a different plan.Residents of large cities distant from the natural environment.They buy holiday homes and rest behind high fences.They are selected in the woods and go fishing, but get there and back by car.Gradually, the nature of human life will be just a decoration, like a 3D movie or computer game.
