It seems no one is given by popular back in the mid 90's the question of what reforms.Over the past 15 years this concept has lost the familiar sound of "radical reforms" and was in tune with the expectations of empty change.If something changes, and, somewhere out there, "above", while at the grassroots level, no changes occur.And instead of a fundamental change people feel the complexity of life and a waste of time.
now need to look for new answers to the old question of what a reform.At the forefront transformation in the medical field, in the field of social security and pension.However, the most pressing issue is the reform of housing and communal services.It is no secret that the pipes, water supply, sewerage, electricity, say, engineering as a whole remained unchanged since Soviet times.Communications have not been repaired for several decades, more than 80%, not only physically, but also obsolete.As yet, LLC acting post-Soviet form of management, inherently inefficient and does not meet the requirements of the time.Paradox: Utilities is the only sector in the Russian economy, where small islands of private capital feel very uncomfortable in the ocean of monopoly-state pressure on any initiatives to improve the situation.
By the way, about the changes.The answer to the question of what the reform is fairly simple.This change in the "rules of the game" in a foreign field that lead to fundamental change.For example, the reform of education, which involves the transfer of the educational autonomy of universities.That is not the case in dealing with the current financial problems, finding funds for the modernization of utilities or building new modern quarters.Not least because it's impossible.According to official data, every year the population pays for the services being cared 1.3 trillion.rubles.And the primary repair is required 9 trillion.By this logic, it turns out that the cost of housing and communal services is expected to grow by 9 times!Yes, and construction of new homes instead of "Khrushchev" will require nearly 25 years of age.This means that new buildings are old, not having to be "born."Not to mention the fact that we do during these 25 years, is also not in the big cities.Russia, to the bureaucratic unfortunately - a big country ...
As a result, the answer to the question of what the reform lies in a slightly different plane.This requirement is guaranteed by the state of private property rights and the de-monopolization of the entire municipal economy.The government, according to a recent decision of the State Council still intends to monopolize the management utility, has transferred substantially all communications to private concessionaires.However, the management - it is not property.Moreover, ownership of the land on which these communications are routed.And it turns out that instead of a single state monopoly born two: the bureaucratic and private.With various functional and market content.And keep in these conditions, the growth of prices for the same utilities services is not possible.
In addition, there is another problem.No one, perhaps, has not particularly argue whether or not the HOA.The law is the law.Another thing, what if the HOA does not depart the property of the whole complex of communications, house territory and the land on which the house, included in it.Without these key elements to create a sense of camaraderie there.It is evident that the reform of housing and communal services drags and land reform, and the reform of the budget system and the ATU.And this is a fundamental change ...
