In the era of "fullness of life" gigantizatsii modern society can be divided into two camps: people-you-for-itself and the majority.Ortega called it a majority of the masses for a number of reasons.People from the suburbs in the human history got staging stories, thereby capturing once minimized position in society.But this situation is fraught with not only in the context of socio-political change.If until now, but rather to the XVIII century, politics and economics were based on elitism bearing increasingly intelligent character, but now we can see the bitterness of the situation by virtue of ideological oppression massification.
Among the massification of this very difficult to live with a man who tries to understand his being, to find a justification of life.I adhere to the concept of Kierkegaard, who claimed that the man thrown into this life.And what did he do?Vegetate to exist or live, to feel life?Man wants to understand the nature of thinking, the world around us, not only from the words of the widely accepted, but also by their own reasoning, searching.During the comparison, we can relate, and I'm not-I analyze patterns of the world around us.
But what frustrated the exposure of a person when he sees around him is not what used to watch?It is a conflict themselves and society rather colorfully described by Camus in his "Essay on the absurd."Everyone is absurd, the question is, to what extent.And that's when homo cogito trying to modify themselves through the world, relevant words of Kierkegaard: "Life depends on us - a change we change others."In fact, I think nothing will change until one becomes aware of itself, its place in the world.
But because massification processes, intellectual erase individual traits, homo cogito extremely hopeless.Wrongly, in my view, worldly-wise men, fathers society bezdeystvennikami believe, they just compared to young minds, not directed bundles of energy, have already realized the hopelessness of fighting windmills public.But with all this life - a struggle, constant struggle with the circumstances, with himself in the first place.
Creator God throws us off the bridge into the murky lake serenity of beingness with the stone mass of our hopes and prejudices on the neck.Conscious of this fact homo cogito trying to swim to the surface, but the established system of the muddy bottom of the device only reinforces our dismay, and the inhabitants rather than untie the load and help you choose, on the contrary, is pulled down to her.Townsfolk do not like it when someone is trying to up, seeing it as a rebuke to themselves, though abandoned themselves to the world.Modern society - is organized system of cogs and gears where traction force and inertia is an illusion, the illusion of a better life, a wonderful prosperity.And when there are new items that do not fit into a certain social status mechanism, it slows down, seizes and stops.Massa do not like the happiness of the individual - it consumes a lot of criticism from within the bile.It is from this point of view, I think, people converged on the need to adopt the concept of "equality": neither I nor you - anybody.People for the most jealous of the success by their own omission which, by the way, they did not bother.They are much easier for someone to criticize, belittle, rather than its own internal agreement to laziness and inaction.They do not care about the notion of happiness itself, which is seen as the result of a specific individual, no.Their touches the fact of the success, the estate of any benefits.This purchasing a washing machine in the house, which has not yet been supplied with water only because the neighbors have already purchased such.
man himself makes himself a slave of circumstances and commitments.It would be much easier to pursue happiness, choosing for themselves the individual path to achieve it, rather than following the template highways.But in the latter case it is easier to manage.Homo cogito - the embodiment of contradictions, a man who wants to be the master of his own life.Man can do everything and even more.According to many scientists, anthropology, man has outlived its usefulness as a biological and social being - there are only boundless psychic space, which, like a clean board, limited by our prejudices and worldview.But whether or not to allow others to plow his bulldozers public facilities?
Nietzsche divides people into masters and slaves.The first tend to be the masters of life, reaching the plants themselves, the necessary standards of life, while the latter rely on various authorities, shifting the burden to them the beauty of choice.
Homo cogito full supporter of humanistic ethics, a person is born and the newly created after a long history of humanity within itself the rules defining cohabitation laws.In contrast to the mass it is completely reflective creature.If the mass man can accustom to live an illusion substitution selection range, then these tricks with homo cogito will not pass.
I have already pointed out the complexity of the co-existence of human thinking and society in general.Once again I want to note that homo cogito- is a human condition, a condition that is a further development of the absurd man-in-turmoil.
But thoughtful people hard to manage in modern times: either they are in power, like Toleranu or will be in the opposition, even though it will bring them a lot of troubles.It's hard to resist the opinions of others, when you have your least persuasive.A striking example is the ancient Greece.The tyrant of Corinth, who could not get the order in its policy, sent an ambassador to Miletus, famous for its respect of the laws and public order.When he returned, he complained to the tyrant that nothing good for two days and did not know, just walking with the governor of Miletus in his possessions and talked on abstract temy..da also noted the strangeness of the ruler of Miletus, that he knocked his staff the ripest,self-leveling spikes and trample them into the ground.The entire control system is based on the similarity of its subordinate elements, this is akin to the Procrustean bed - or wedged in the parameters, or you infringe.
We inspire desire to depress us, because it is easier to manage weight suppressed.
And in conclusion I would like to slightly change the expression of Plato, the weight can not be homo cogito.
