As it became known from reliable sources, the head of the local municipal administration of the municipality of Vasilevsky (St. Petersburg, Vasilievsky district) Lyapakina SVI do not wish to execute the decisions of the Board of MO MO Vasilevsky and fulfill the legitimate demands of heads of municipalities.
By the way, Lyapakinoy Svetlana back in 2009 ended a contract for the exercise of the powers of the Head of the local administration, and taking advantage of the situation with the change of the head of Defense, who resigned for personal reasons, it is not compulsory tender procedures, extended its authority to datebypassing Art.131 of the Russian Federation.This fact was established by the prosecutor's office, but on how much it is legitimate ?....
result of this self-will was that Lyapakina SVfor a long time myself subscribed bonuses and allowances.To date, there are undeniable facts of corruption and abuse of his official powers of the head of the local administration Lyapakinoy SVwhen calculating premiums, allowances and material assistance to other municipal employees, as well as the payment of cash rewards to persons working in the municipality and municipal institutions.
quote OEB and KP Vasileostrovsky district of St. Petersburg "is currently getting the facts Lyapakinoy SVpremiums, allowances holiday content is partially installed.As part of the material testing KUSP to verify the legitimacy calculation of the above bonuses and allowances. »
Since taking office, the new head of Defense revealed these facts and had to bring this information to the deputies, which caused extreme bewilderment and condemnation, as well asHe appealed to law enforcement agencies, which is currently under review and investigation of the qualifications of these offenses, and soon they will be given a proper assessment.According to our information, there are facts and rougher financial irregularities related to the waste of budgetary funds.
In particular, the situation began to unfold after the regular meeting of the Board members decided to introduce on an ongoing basis to the municipal council as a lawyer.It is this decision and tried to protest Lyapakina SVShe filed for a decision of the municipal council to introduce a new standard unit "lawyer", and requested the court to declare illegal the decision of the court, referring to the opportunity to not do it becausewe are violating Article 83 of the Budget Code.The court found it impossible to meet its claim, as found violations in the decision of the Board.Lyapakina SVShe withdrew the lawsuit.
reasonable question arises: why?Under the existing legislation, and in fact, the RA Defense - the employer and the head of the local administration - the executive - administrative body, manager, administrator.Logically, the question arises: if the manager refuses to comply with orders of the head, does not provide the necessary documents, misleading deputies legal casuistry, but do not want to see a lawyer in municipal sovete- What is it?After all, the presence of a lawyer in any municipality - rather, it is a mandatory post?Or she did not want to let the people okruga- and St. Petersburg - knew that the money paid by honest taxpayers, it just puts it in his pocket?Since the confirmation of a formal opinion on the PCB illegal calculating allowances.
Not to mention the fact that the 2012 budget was nearly swamped, and clear answers - and reports on its activities Lyapakina SVstill it did not provide.
Russian President VVPutin and the Russian Government have called for the fight against corruption, the establishment of the Committee.Question: What can be a struggle, even if the head of the local administration is against the law? ....
As it became known from reliable sources, the head of the local municipal administration of the municipality of Vasilevsky (St. Petersburg, Vasilievsky district) Lyapakina SVI do not wish to execute the decisions of the Board of MO MO Vasilevsky and fulfill the legitimate demands of heads of municipalities.
By the way, Lyapakinoy Svetlana back in 2009 ended a contract for the exercise of the powers of the Head of the local administration, and taking advantage of the situation with the change of the head of Defense, who resigned for personal reasons, it is not compulsory tender procedures, extended its authority to datebypassing Art.131 of the Russian Federation.This fact was established by the prosecutor's office, but on how much it is legitimate ?....
result of this self-will was that Lyapakina SVfor a long time myself subscribed bonuses and allowances.To date, there are undeniable facts of corruption and abuse of his official powers of the head of the local administration Lyapakinoy SVwhen calculating premiums, allowances and material assistance to other municipal employees, as well as the payment of cash rewards to persons working in the municipality and municipal institutions.
quote OEB and KP Vasileostrovsky district of St. Petersburg "is currently getting the facts Lyapakinoy SVpremiums, allowances holiday content is partially installed.As part of the material testing KUSP to verify the legitimacy calculation of the above bonuses and allowances. »
Since taking office, the new head of Defense revealed these facts and had to bring this information to the deputies, which caused extreme bewilderment and condemnation, as well as addressed inlaw enforcement agencies, which is currently under review and investigation of the qualifications of these offenses, and soon they will be given a proper assessment.According to our information, there are facts and rougher financial irregularities related to the waste of budgetary funds.
In particular, the situation began to unfold after the regular meeting of the Board members decided to introduce on an ongoing basis to the municipal council as a lawyer.It is this decision and tried to protest Lyapakina SVShe filed for a decision of the municipal council to introduce a new standard unit "lawyer", and requested the court to declare illegal the decision of the court, referring to the opportunity to not do it becausewe are violating Article 83 of the Budget Code.The court found it impossible to meet its claim, as found violations in the decision of the Board.Lyapakina SVShe withdrew the lawsuit.
reasonable question arises: why?Under the existing legislation, and in fact, the RA Defense - the employer and the head of the local administration - the executive - administrative body, manager, administrator.Logically, the question arises: if the manager refuses to comply with orders of the head, does not provide the necessary documents, misleading deputies legal casuistry, but do not want to see a lawyer in municipal sovete- What is it?After all, the presence of a lawyer in any municipality - rather, it is a mandatory post?Or she did not want to let the people okruga- and St. Petersburg - knew that the money paid by honest taxpayers, it just puts it in his pocket?Since the confirmation of a formal opinion on the PCB illegal calculating allowances.
Not to mention the fact that the 2012 budget was nearly swamped, and clear answers - and reports on its activities Lyapakina SVstill it did not provide.
Russian President VVPutin and the Russian Government have called for the fight against corruption, the establishment of the Committee.Question: What can be a struggle, even if the head of the local administration is against the law? ....
