The transition to market planning of the company as a factor in development

distribution of corporate control is dependent on the relative specificity of the factors of production, which form the corporation as a company and on how to build business planning.At that time, the physical assets, or a significant part of almost always a specific investment, other inputs may be greater or lesser extent, to specialize, t. E. Become specific, depending on several factors, which include, for example, technological featuresthe manufacturing process, information structure of the company, corporate culture, marketing planning, market conditions relevant factor, the existence of mechanisms to ensure the interests of suppliers of specific factors, not the owners of the company, and so on. n.

Taking into account the ability of economic agents to influence the political process,we can assume that the marketing plan in the choice of suppliers of financial resources and the organization of relations with them, management companies will be directed to ensure their own interests, including by influencing the regulators and regulations.

Based on this assumption, we turn to the peculiarities of the Russian economy and Russian companies.

Among the characteristic features of the Soviet economy, which is largely inherited the Russian economy were peculiar and unique largest structural and sectoral imbalances, the central planning of the company.All this combined with the bureaucratization of industrial management, egalitarianism, the lack of effective mechanisms to encourage employees.Perhaps, almost all in the middle of the 80s it became clear the futility of such a direction of development.The need for a profound transformation was like at the micro level, where the main plan of the company, and at the macro level, which implies a structural transformation of the economy as a whole.But the structural reorganization of the economy has been very ambitious challenge that was associated with the political stability that the country lacked.It is not surprising that the authors chose to focus on reforms, reform of the formal aspect of property relations, hoping that it will become a catalyst for structural change.

result of this approach was, dynamic tension between the structural parameters of the economy of the country and attempts to "boost" the transition to market planning of the company.This was highlighted in the sectors with the highest level of monopolization, narrow specialization, technologically backward.The fact that the human capital of these branches actually has the character of a specific factor of production.Termination of its interaction with other factors, the closure of companies will lead to the fact that most workers are unable to find a job, that is not able to realize their human capital.Meanwhile, the involvement of these enterprises financing is possible only if the establishment of providers of capital control over them, and further deep restructuring, as in its current state, these enterprises can not be profitable.

The state will inevitably need to take the role of chief mediator in the economy to offset the negative consequences of the distorted economic structure and financial flows in it, to stimulate the transition to a modern market development strategies.