The words in question are used not in isolation, one at a time and in combination.Not all of them are freely connected to each other.Lexical Collocations - is their ability to connect with a certain range of other words.Sometimes, because of the complexity of such a choice in a speech allowed lexical errors.
In the sentence, the words are interconnected and the meaning and grammatically.In the latter case, this communication provides a grammatically correct speech.Semantic relationships provide the correct statements on content.As used in speech words should be consistent with others.This manifests itself in two kinds of compatibility - lexical and semantic.
lexical compatibility refers to the ability to engage in a combination of the words with only a limited number of (or units) of words.
Semantic as expressed in the ability to relate words with whole class of other words that share a common sense.For example, a group of verbs that describe the human condition (think, laugh, etc.) can be combined with all of the words that refer to people (doctor passer).
In some cases, when it is not about concrete things, and about their relationship (abstract, abstract vocabulary), the lexical compatibility is due.For example, you can "give advice", "inspect", "to resist", etc.All these verbs play a role, they are easy to replace synonyms ("advise", "explore", "fight"), but the confusion is almost impossible.Russian-speaking people never say, for example, "to make Council."
Linguistic human consciousness is endowed with the power of election.This property was formed over the centuries, in daily practice.However, to properly use the word in speech, knowledge of their values is not enough.It should be at entry to pay attention to the compatibility of words.You have to be careful with synonyms.For example, the adjective "true" and "true" value of the same, but we do not say "true friend" or "true document" as a true friend can and documents - authentic.This is the lexical compatibility.
Examples of such compounds are numerous words.Frequently they may have limitations in combinations.First of all, they can simply be incompatible within the meaning of "land restaurant", "orange hare", etc.In addition, the irreconcilability may be due to their grammatical nature ("a great singer", "my house") or lexical features (you can "cause grief" but of joy do not say, we say "all year round", but not "all time").
Sometimes impaired lexical compatibility perceived quite comical ("recent past").However, in violation of literary works used deliberately to achieve certain effects: impress the reader to pay attention to something, entertain, etc.For example, "The Merry Widow", "hung with beards," "forgiveness of others' virtues', 'latest bout of youth", etc.In this case, you need to consider the irreconcilability as a stylistic device.
Some options improper compatibility are massive (often different people use them in a speech to the same errors) "meeting convened" (you "meeting took place"), "to develop horizons" (need to "broaden horizons").This is due to the fact that in one situation can use different combinations stable, and often leads to the replacement of components semantic inaccuracy.The traditional phrase "Let me raise a toast!" Is also incorrect.You can either "raise a glass" or "toast."
also typical bug where broken lexical compatibility, is the phrase "improved level of service."The level can be elevated, but may improve the quality.
