labor aristocracy - is a special layer, which the bourgeoisie sought to bribe.This process became feasible thanks to super-profits from the export of capital to the colonies.That, in essence, is a labor aristocracy?The concept is inconsistent enough.Let us examine it in more detail below.
General
So, the labor aristocracy - is a special category of people who are bribed by the bourgeoisie excess profits obtained during the operation of the liberated countries and the redistribution of national income.In particular, it has become topical after the collapsed colonial system.In order to understand what the labor aristocracy, it is necessary to take into account the scientific and technological revolution, which began in the 2nd half of the XX century.Additional surplus value has become a major source of bribery.She pulled through the introduction of advanced technology while maintaining monopoly prices.
Features Education
labor aristocracy (defined by Engels and Marx) originated in the XIX century in the UK.It included bourgeoisified, privileged layers consisting of highly skilled factory workers.They, in turn, consisted of closed shop unions.The class was tasked to reformist conciliatory policy.The labor aristocracy bribed colonial and commercial and industrial monopoly of Great Britain.Thanks to a huge portion of excess profits are allocated to the top of the class.This was done in order to slow down the labor movement and split it.
era of imperialism and the further development of
With its advent that a labor aristocracy, found in a number of other states.We are talking about France, USA, Germany and others.The social base of opportunism was the labor aristocracy.It turned into a kind of bulwark of social-chauvinism.Lenin wrote a lot about current events.He considered new for quite philistine in lifestyle, as well as the size and earnings outlook in general.Moreover, Lenin said that the labor aristocracy - is the most important social support of the bourgeoisie.
Features of influence on the formation of the interlayer
In some capitalist countries it is not the same.In this case, it plays a big role relationship of class forces, and the political maturity of the working class movement and its character.With regard to bribe the top in Russia, it was a much smaller scale and weaker than, for example, in Western Europe and the United States.It does not greatly affect the working masses, as leader of the proletariat and spoke.
development after the 1st World War
During this period, the position of the labor aristocracy considerably weakened.This was due to new ideological, political and socio-economic factors.A narrowing of the traditional layers.This was due to changes in the structure of capitalist production and the working class.The role of skilled labor decreased.This was due to the widespread and conveyor line method.The global economic crisis was a major blow to the labor aristocracy.There has been a significant undermining of positions.There was weakening the trade unions.Also notes the growing influence of the production of professional societies.
development after the 2nd World War
During this period the power of the social system is increasingly influenced the policies and internal processes of imperialism.There onslaught of the workers' movement and the elimination of colonial regimes.The monopoly bourgeoisie disseminates its ideology.It uses new methods and tools, which can also include "human relations".This is the demagogic propaganda of equality for all workers.Thanks to this "partnership of labor and capital" involves all more layers of this class.The labor aristocracy declined sharply.This was due to the passage of the revolutionary scientific and technological processes.Thanks to them, in the structure of the working class is undergoing profound changes.There was his extension.This was done mainly due to new orders that had more of training and education.
further development
So, the labor aristocracy significantly narrowed.Despite this, certain parts of this class persisted reformist illusions.It also traced the intelligentsia and ordinary employees.However, the whole picture involves the formation of a large-scale anti-imperialist forces of the front and "rebirth" of social and political consciousness.This reflects the fall in this class and the crisis of the bourgeoisie.Thus, the concept of "labor aristocracy" is no longer used in political literature.
analysis features
for its holding in a particular country should take into account historical specificity.It also requires the calculation of numerous factors that can determine the value of the labor aristocracy and its political importance, the economic situation and so on.All of this is a certain complexity to the universal sociological planning.From a political point of view it is necessary to identify common features of this layer.This also applies to its prospects, historical development, and the broad outlines of political expression.The problems of the labor aristocracy can be regarded as a position of a particular social forces and theoretical abstraction, and, in different imperialist countries.In the works of Lenin, these materials are constantly repeated.However, he did not attempt a systematic definition of the subject in detail.As for the Vladimir Ilyich paramount for him was politically motivated fight against opportunism.Thus, a detailed sociological analysis of the aristocratic layer fades into the background.The socialist movement had many subjects for debate.First of all, we discussed the role of the labor aristocracy in the class struggle in the imperialist countries, rather than the presence of a whole.How quickly developed a privileged upper class, there was everywhere.In particular, this applies to the developed capitalist countries.In reality, there was no need Marxists in the detection of the phenomenon.
