greatest value of any human society are healthy children.Healthy both physically and mentally!Therefore, it is quite natural desire of every parent to protect their child from the evil influence of low-grade films and other information "dirt."Currently, the state is trying at the legislative level to resolve this issue.
Child Protection Act № 436-FZ contains a list of information that should not be accessible to children of a certain age.Such information includes information of a pornographic nature, obscene language, as well as information that can encourage children to harm their health and life - the use of prohibited substances (of all kinds of narcotic and psychotropic drugs), alcohol, tobacco products and others. The law also prohibits the giving childreninformation that justifies violence, cruelty and various violations of the law and denies family values.For these reasons the law on the protection of children from harmful information set specific list of harmful information, but the criteria are highly subjective.Even the concept of family values for each person can be an individual.
Act to protect children from media information requires the labeling set when showing of a program, for example, "16" means that children under 16 can not watch a movie or program.But there is a logical question: whether the children comply with these restrictions?It has always been information that was not available to children, and if the parents left the child of one of the TV, it may violate the prohibition.
Of course, everything depends on the education of children.If the child is conscious, he can switch off the TV when he saw that he could not watch this movie.But have you ever seen so obedient and conscious of children?No matter how hard the government to take care of the moral education of young people, a crucial role is played not by bans, not teachers or teachers, but only the child's parents and his close relatives (grandparents).
There is no doubt that the law on the protection of children need as parents more comfortable when at the beginning of the view that a transfer they already know that the child can not watch it.But the function of the law is limited to the provision of certain information about the product media: for example, if bears the marking "18", the law respected.And watching the children or not, decide to mothers and fathers of these children.We must approach the issue not formally, but in reality.
In this case, actually prevent the penetration of harmful information on the house may only mother and father, if, of course, care about the education of their children, rather than the law on the protection of children.Now it is very common is the attitude of parents, which is expressed by the words: "Let them look, it's still there on every corner."Such an approach is unacceptable.
matter how good the law on the protection of children, but parents can protect their children from harmful information, corrupting children's minds.There is no need to shift the responsibility on teachers, need to be role models and educate their child, including by way of explanation as to why this or that information may be undesirable for him!
