Now a lot of people are faced with the challenge of writing a review.Very often there is this need among students and researchers.Often confused with the review of reviews.This is a big mistake, because the two forms of expression opinions regarding any work are fundamental differences.Ignorance of these nuances manifestation fraught with ignorance and illiteracy on the part of the author.But it is worth noting that the review - this is not an essay on a free topic.It has a clear plan and must have a specific content.On these and many other nuances of writing works in this genre will be discussed in the article.What
review
word "review" (recencio) from Latin translates as "survey, inspection."The term entrenched in the literature at the junction of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Review is regarded as one of the genres of criticism in the literature.But despite its apparent uniqueness, it is divided into several basic types.
main types of reviews
1. Review can be written in the form of an essay.The author in this case, describes his impression from reading the book.But this syllable can not be written review of a scientific article.Example - a review of some artistic literary work.Essays often written in the form of a lyrical meditation.
2. journalistic or critical article of small size can also be represented as a review of the article.An example of such work can be found in journals that discuss current literary and social problems.
3. Another view of this genre is avtoretsenziya.In this case the author himself describes briefly the meaning of his work.Avtoretsenziyu author may supplement the comments on the information contained in the main part of the work.
4. The detailed annotation is most often used as a review of the article.An example of this form must contain information about the meaning of work, writing features, and the main advantages and disadvantages of working.
5. The final view of the genre is a review of the examination, which is written for the assessment of student understanding them any work.This may be a review of the article.Example of writing can be found in a textbook.
Since the review is a scientific or literary work, it must contain certain parts.
What should include a review
1. A detailed description of the object of analysis.Always indicating the genre, author and main characteristics of the work, such as style, size and analysis techniques used (in the case of a scientific article).
2. The reviewer should justify the relevance of the topic, on which the work was written.
3. The review indicated the main idea of the work.That is what the author wanted to say it in their work.
4. Review must contain a brief description of the work.The reviewer is obliged to give a general description of work with indication of its key points.
5. Gaps should also be noted in the review article.Example: insufficient sources of information or the use of irrelevant data, and others.
6. At the end of the review need to be sure to draw conclusions.They should be concise and unambiguous.The findings should provide information about the scientific or artistic value of the work.
What distinguishes the review from the Review
is often confused with the revocation review.But this is wrong, because these two genres have significant differences.The review must necessarily contain all the above points.While the review - it is only a short description of its operation without detailed analysis.Responses are much more common than in the review article.Sample Review - a brief description of which is given at the end or the beginning of any book.Its purpose is only the allocation of the main idea of the work and a brief description.
As written review of the article
Quite often the question arises: "How do you spell review of the article?"Sample reviews can be found in scientific journals, but, nevertheless, for the proper preparation is necessary to know the basic principles and nuances of her writing.
most important rule that everyone must learn reviewer - this is what the review should always be grounded and reasoned.Read any product of the reader (whether scientific or artistic) can merely express his thoughts with "like" you "do not like", "believe" or "I do not believe."The reviewer is an opinion must reinforce arguments.
If the reviewer hypothesizes the opposite opinion of the author, it must prove it.But it is important to remember that the review - it is only a short analysis of the article or book.In this work are unacceptable abstract judgments about other articles, books, and more.The review noted an opinion with respect to this work.
