Insult is a violation of the right of everyone, regardless of gender, age, race or any other criterion.It is always an unpleasant situation that causes the offended person a lot of discomfort, ridiculed by society and can lead to mental disorders and neuroses.Interestingly, personal injury - an article of the Criminal Code or the Administrative Code?What is this wrongful act and what is responsible for it?All the answers below.
Insult of personality - an article of the Criminal Code
Does the Russian legislator that act as socially dangerous, for it establishes that the criminal responsibility?The answer is no.Although it may be noted that a couple of years ago it was different.Previously, the penalty for a violation of the right to establish the Criminal Code.Insult the person was enshrined in Article 130 of the Criminal Code.Currently, it is recognized as having lapsed and is no longer valid."Insult of personality" - the article of the Criminal Code, which consisted of two parts.The first was a general in relation to the next standard.The second aggravating circumstance was provided - public insult.Why the legislator decided that the wrongful act has become less socially dangerous?Some legal scholars believe that "Insult of personality", the article of the Criminal Code under the number 130 has been excluded from the law due to the fact that currently a policy of humanization.That is why there was a mass decriminalization of crimes tend to be a little gravity.
Insult of personality - an article of the Administrative Code
Currently, responsibility for the wrongful act is set in the framework of administrative law.In 2011, the adopted changes and amendments to the Administrative Code.A separate article was introduced for personal injury.2013 did not become the starting point for making regular changes to the present day accepted norm is preserved in its original state.In the legal sense, it is commonly understood as an insult to the humiliation of a man, his honor and dignity, which is always expressed in an unseemly manner, for example by means of slaps in the face, foul language, obscene gestures.Wines offender always intentional.After all, he is well aware of what he was doing, and not only wants to commit such acts.The subject of this offense must necessarily be sane and have reached the age of administrative responsibility - namely 16 years.Installed also qualified by abuse - public humiliation.Part 3 of Article 5.61 points to diametrically different rate.It establishes the responsibility for the assumption that the insult was inflicted in public, namely, the media or any other demonstrated work.
Responsibility
We have already established that the person who commits such an offense shall be liable for administrative law.That is, he did not face a criminal record.Code of Administrative Offences establishes punishment for insulting a fine, the amount of which is ranked.
