Before you say that is a review of a sample of the article, I would like to talk about the genre.After only knowing its specifics and sorting out its features, will write a really competent journalistic work.
Review as an analytical genre
If we draw a parallel between this genre and in any other, for comparison in this case is best suitable detailed annotation.They have a fairly similar tasks.And annotations and reviews are designed to tell the reader what is at stake in a particular product (play, film, paper) than it is interesting, what is particularly noteworthy.Yet the genre has something in common with the literary-critical article as writing person must have his own opinion, my idea, to be able to competently explain the essence of the work and bring it to the readers.This is not a review for which you just impressions from reading or scanned.Review - a multi-faceted, complex and interesting genre.You must be able to work in it.And that is why it is important to examine more than one sample review articles, and to learn how to apply theoretical skills in practice.
Constituent reviews
So, you should consider what is in the review.The facility serves as its artistic phenomenon that creates any kind of art.In this case, considered review of the article from the magazine, so that help for her writing will be just journalistic work.That is the phenomenon of the mass media.The article to which it is necessary to write a review, is the subject.Now for the main tasks.The author must not only submit an article, it is obliged to evaluate it, and from all sides, if possible.This is the main specificity of the genre - to consider an article from all points of view.This multidimensional nature determines the complexity of the review.This goal sets itself unless the display (in terms of the genre).It is important that the author was able to correctly relate the information aspect of the analytical, objective - subjective.If all this will be fulfilled, then we can say half of genre features taken into account.
How to arrange a review
Once considered the main features of the genre, you can proceed to the main part.Namely, the question of how to write a review article.This is a very important question.And best of all, for clarity, to bring the sample review articles describing the sequence of presentation of the author's thoughts on paper.First of all, there is a title of the article, full name of its author.After that - a description of the main issues and problems that tells a journalist in his work.It should be noted that a sample review of a scientific article is somewhat different from that on which the reviewers work, describing the magazine or newspaper articles.However, the differences are small.If we consider a scientific work, it is necessary next to the title of the article indicate affiliation and regalia.The third point comes the relevance of the work, and then - to determine the most important aspects of the publication.Finally, conclusions about everything that was said by the reviewer.Rounding out the publication of information about the person who is the author reviews: the place of his work, academic degree, title, name, seal and signature.
Stylistic features
After the sample review of the articles has been reviewed, it is necessary to pay attention to the subtleties of the writing process of publication.Many difficult start to express the idea, however, guided by some of the tips and the above example, you can write a really intelligent work.Many young journalists are concerned about how to write a review article.To begin to follow some tips expert reviewers.In the text are advised to use such phrases as "in the article, the author focuses on issues such as ..." or "he competent analyzes and rightly points out ..." and so on. D. These phrases can not only tie the proposal among themselves, but also to initiatenew paragraph.After all, every such phrase includes the development of: a reviewer could write about how the author perceives the story, as he describes what methods it uses for how rich his speech, replete she compared and contrasted.To write such good work, you need to feel the reviewer, because only in this way will understand the essence of the writing as much as possible to bring it up to the reader.
Summary and Conclusions
Review - a very important part in any journalistic work.The author is obliged to organize and compile all of the above to them, and how to more clearly and concisely.The conclusion is best to start with the words: "Based on the foregoing, it can be argued that ...", and then just give an opinion whether the article informative and useful to the reader, it is clear whether its author outlined the essence, space or not, how good his stylewriting.In a word - all summed up and put thus the point.
