Potatoes or oats

click fraud protection

In accordance with the Resolution of the Administration of the Novosibirsk region Iskitim district №368 from 30.04.1993g."On the registration of closed joint stock company" HASK "(with changes made by the Decree of 30.06.93 №551), for JSC" HASK "was enshrined in the collective share ownership of 850 hectares of farmland.

On the basis of the said decision by the former members of the collective farm - the shareholders of CJSC "HASK" - have been issued a certificate of ownership in the land which they are assigned land shares of 10 hectares each.

In 1996, a general meeting of shareholders of JSC "HASK" on the transfer of land shares to private farming.

Decree of Head of Iskitim District of Novosibirsk Region number 126 of 01/03/94 and in accordance with the Land Code of the Russian Federation at the JSC "HASK" were confiscated land to provide sites for personal use.

by order of the head of administration of the Novosibirsk region Iskitim district № 433 from 08.05.1996, № 822 from 10.09.1996, №1098 from 27.12.1996, №1099 from 27.12.1996, №1100 from 27.12.1996, №1101 from 27.12.1996, №1102 from 27.12.1996, №1103 from 27.12.1996, №374 from 30.06.2000, the shareholders of JSC "HASK" presented land for private farming.

In 2003, under the Agreement №52 from 10.04.2003g FSUE West Siberian scientific and research and Design Institute of Land Management "ZapSibNiigiprozem" made the plan boundaries of the municipality "Ust-Chёmsky Rural Council" Iskitim area Novosibirsk region.In the manufacture of the plan were used, and title certificates of title documents, materials, land survey and land acquisition.According to the plan, all the selected areas for ancillary services have been put on the plan, and compiled a list of land owners.

Persons wishing to engage in crop production each year worked their land (according to the plan boundaries) and grown crop production.

Another part of the population by the end of 1990 d.Harino early 2000s renounced his ownership of the land or sold to other owners, because it had no opportunity to process and pay taxes.Among them were the wife Andreyevs (Vladimir A. and Elena).They sold their plots of 10 hectares each Lynovu Vasily Ivanovich.

In accordance with the protocol of survey (1994), a list of land owners and assigned inventory numbers from 1996 portion Andreeva VAon the plan boundaries MO "Ust-Chёmsky village council" Iskitim area Novosibirsk region was under №113, and Andreyeva under №125.

Since 2006 Lynov VIhas made the development of these areas since 2008 and grew them from / crops (potatoes, cereals).Some portion Andreeva VA(5 hectares) during 2008-2009 Parowan because weeds clogging site.

In 2010, on the land in the area of ​​5 ha was planted elite seed potatoes.

One seat on the days come director of "KKH" deputy of the Council of Deputies Iskitim District of Novosibirsk Region senior specialist of the department of land relations of JSC "Siberian Anthracite" Mr. Shevtsov VAa statement that the site belongs to JSC "KKH".For the authenticity of his words, he showed cadastral numbers to all plots of land JSC "HASK."In accordance with its cadastral number, bought Lynovym VIsections were a totally different place.

In accordance with the decision of the administration of the Novosibirsk region Iskitim district №1103 from 27.12.96g land for №113 (to the border plan) previously owned by JSC "Voskhod".However, according to the presented Mr. Shevtsov VAcadastral number of land is located in the JSC "HASK"?

On offer Lynova VItemporarily in 2010 to cede the land planted with potatoes ( 5 hectares) of land equivalent to 10 hectares in MP ... (servant and protector of the people), Mr. Shevtsov VAI said no and offered to dig just planted potatoes.

Two days later, on the orders of Mr. Shevtsov VAKungurtsev DVsowed the land of oats planted potatoes.

According to estimates the amount of damage Lynova VIIt amounted to 1.5 million rubles, including:

- the cost of fallow land 50 t. rub

- soil preparation for planting potatoes 20 t. rub

- planting potatoes 20t.rub

- the cost of seed 300 thousand rubles

- lost income 1110 m. rubles.

For nineteen villagers Harin treated their allocated land or leased to farmers.During this period, and at the moment no claims on the land boundaries of the owners of these sites have been encountered.

However, with the advent of the village Harina "KKH" and deputy director of the Board of Deputies of Iskitim District of Novosibirsk Region senior specialist of the land relations of JSC "Siberian Anthracite" Mr. Shevtsov VAcultivated land became assigned to JSC "KKH" and in return allocate overgrown, uncultivated for more than 19 years of land.

For unknown reasons vary cadastral numbers of sites and their location on the border plan.

In 2010, the villagers Harin twice appealed to the Prosecutor of the Novosibirsk region of determining the status of the land on. Harina.However, the Prosecutor's Office specific answer Iskitim District of Novosibirsk Region has not followed.In the concluding part of the judgment Iskitim interdistrict prosecutor on 15.04.2010 states: "... the right of ownership of land makes out of" KKH ", and those shareholders who have not entered into the society did not pass the state registration in accordance with this issue in the ownership of land not possible ».

follows from the above that all of the right to determine the status of land shareholders and their location on the border plan belong to JSC "KKH" (or rather personally Director deputy of the Council of Deputies Iskitim District of Novosibirsk Region senior specialist of the land relations of JSC "Siberian Anthracite"Mr. Shevtsov VA), and not co-owners, as specified in the Federal Law №162-03 «Oboborote agricultural land on the territory of the Novosibirsk region," Article 14 paragraph 2, Art.15.

By what right and on what principles are changing cadastral numbers of land plots and their location on the border plan ??

Why private property co-owners of CJSC "HASK" dispose of powerful people self-nominated elected representatives, in the likeness of Mr. Shevtsov VA, not the participants shared ownership, as stated in the federal law ??

December 14, 2010 on the site iskitimcity.ru was an article "The deputy arbitrariness in Harina (Iskitim district)."This article put similar questions.

Who can help to understand the question or answer consistent with the current legislation of the Russian Federation?