In Russian, there are two types of syntactic relations - coordinative and subordinate connection.That connection with the types of proposals serves as the basis for the entire syntax of the Russian language.
Writing involves a combination of virtually equal to the syntactic point of view of words or parts of a complex sentence.(The sky clouds quickly fled, the wind rushed frightened bird. She read the poem out loud, confident, expressive. Smart and handsome, he was always eligible bachelor).Submission, in contrast, indicates a state of dependence of one word (or part of a sentence) from another (put on the table. I left the room because it was stuffy).
coordinative bond uniform.There adversative, connecting, separating species.The indicator is the union.In this coordinative unions rusovedy some call "formless words", since neither its own form nor own values they have.Their task - to establish equal relations of different types (values) between words and parts of the sentence.
coordinative adversative relationship is expressed using the adversative conjunctions (but, but, nevertheless, and, yes (Val. "But") (In the morning it was very cold, but the sun was shining brightly. I doubted the success, but I have nolistening).
coordinative bond coupling present in sentences, which takes place in a moment. It is expressed by connecting conjunctions (and, yes, and also, no ... no, well, not only ... but also, yes (Val. "and") (I'm afraid to ride on the carousel, and my friends are pretty shorts. Not only the children liked the last series, but adults have tried not to miss a series).
coordinative disjunctive (or something ... something else,not ... not) are an indication of what can only be one action of all of the above either of these actions occur in succession (Either you leave us a receipt, or we will not give you the required amount. That snow falls from a cloudy sky, it is a fine coldrain. Not tears of pain running down his face, not just the rain dripping).
coordinative bond in a simple sentence is needed in order to push the boundaries, to show that several subordinate members are in the same relationship with the principal (guests come and preacher. He was angry, but not angry. I'll see you today or a couple of days. ItThey are seen not only children but also adults).
In these peer relationships may consist of:
- specifying and clarifying terms.(We saw later in the evening. She waited in the park, in the gazebo).
- Explanatory the sentence with explanatory words, to which they are attached either through alliances or without (prefix or prefix, used for the formation of new words).
- connecting members with the words to which they are attached.(Some guests, particularly the young, were surprised by the splendor of the holiday).
Some linguists believe that the words combined using ordinative communication form coordinative phrases.Usually all words are pronounced the same part of speech (wild and free, bold, but cautious).However, there are other designs in which part of a co phrase expressed by different parts of speech (Brave (adj.), But excited (and.)).
Such structures in the proposal are a member, forming a homogeneous series.(Passionate but chaotic monologue not convinced the audience).
and coordinative phrases and sentences with ordinative bond accompanied by intonation in pronouncing listing.
coordinative bond in a complex proposal indicates the equality of parts (I have come in time, but the library was closed. We have tried, but only the glider never flew).
