war is perhaps the worst thing which could teach mankind during the years of its existence.Floods, earthquakes, tornadoes - all this whim of nature, where people rallied since ancient times for the sake of survival.This is a challenge more than prepared to learn, will stand a man - of course, with the people themselves can not do anything.
War - it is a challenge, a completely artificial, driven by a desire of one man to kill another.This is a real plague of mankind, for which he will be ashamed until the end of time.
poetizatsii War
If you pay attention to the way light of this terrible, bloody events in literature, the cinema or the theater, you will notice that, along with cruelty, horror and chaos has always featured beauty, selflessness, greatness.Remember even the Trojan war waged because of the love of the beautiful Helen?Or the Wars of the Roses?Or even the Great Patriotic War?How is it covered in the literature and cinema?
As a rule, war is considered a great feat of the people, which subsequently decided to compose a legend and write a book about heroes.From all this it can be concluded that art is largely poeticizes this terrible event, the scourge of humanity.The moral choice of the person in the war at the same time, as a rule, goes by the wayside, but more on that later.
Choosing War
First of all, it should be said that this phenomenon in the history is always someone else's dream.As a rule, it is not the will of the people, as they write in books and talk to beautiful television programs.In fact, this decision completely specific person who was able to give his own idea of life, it infect people.For example, take the war unleashed by the once Nazi Germany.We would like ordinary workers, teachers and librarians to exterminate the Jews and other races (which, by the way, lived up to this quite successfully)?No.This is like Adolf Hitler, who managed with the help of his charisma, persuasiveness, and other personal qualities to convince people that they need a war.
moral choice of the person in the war, in fact, begins with a question: is it worth it to unleash?
Features selection
If we were affected by this issue, you should think about what kind of choices can stand in front of the person involved in the war.The topic may seem simple and insignificant, but this assumption is supremely wrong.
How many falls on the person at the first call of military action?He must not only decide for the war or against it, but if he take up arms, or better just to wait it out a terrible time to save yourself and your family.
Almost immediately behind it before it raises the question of the division of the ideal.Man forced to decide for which he went to kill.Who was he going to kill?Who is the enemy?
And of course, we should not forget the moral choice of the person in the war.In this case, we have in mind not only the choice between the "shoot and not shoot," but between "save or not save."
And, worst of all, it is impossible to choose the right option.
Alea jacta est
Unfortunately, not always the man goes to war at his own request.Sometimes, it requires that a State or an elementary need to protect your family.This is the most terrible thing.
problem of moral choice in the war does not rise before anyone goes there voluntarily, who goes back to kill for the sake of killing.If we talked earlier about Nazi Germany, it will use an example to continue.No mental vibrations have not experienced the Nazis in the full sense of the word - people who take pleasure in killing other people.
But there were those who did not want to go to the front.Those who are obliged to take up arms and go to battle to defend someone else's ideals.
Here are just in front of them and opens the problem of moral choice in the war.Kill or die yourself, a friend or save their own lives, flee or to remain in the position until his last breath.And that's just the most vivid examples of impossible dilemmas.
Of two evils
Many will disagree, but the likelihood is very high that no matter what choice was made, it would be wrong.Following the procedure of famous sophists, we note that it all depends on which side to look at this or that phenomenon.Life-saving for some, it can be an invaluable act, the greatest of all.For others, it will be a betrayal of the country and the fall of man.
Than be guided, if you want to make a moral choice man in the war?The only correct option in this situation, perhaps, would be personal beliefs, the very soul of man, which can promote or oppose a particular decision.
few examples
If we raise a topic such as moral choices, examples are needed in the first place.Again referring to the literature, recall the famous hero of Boris Pasternak - Doctor Zhivago.At one point he found himself with a gun in his hands in front of a whole field of soldiers, thrown into the fray.The hero of the novel could shoot people and thereby help their own, but instead he released the clip in a tree - so unnatural for him was a desire to take someone's life.
or remember Irena Sendler, which saved two and a half thousand children, bringing them out of the concentration camps in the bag.Just imagine what a moral choice of the person in the war stood before her.It could save a life or lose his, and in pain that is difficult to even imagine.Yet she ventured.
Why is it so difficult
When you want to make a moral choice of the person, the arguments for and against can be very different.But the biggest, most significant of these acts, of course, fear.You can be afraid for their own lives or well-being of his family, for what others will say, for what awaits in the next day.All of this often confusing and does not allow a person to remain in a decidedly inhuman situation.
Among other factors stands out the issue of remuneration.Of course, from the standpoint of morality, even can be no question that the choice was between the money and the life of a child, an old man, a woman ... but any living creature, indeed.However, there are also those with the scales tilts, on the other hand.
Open your eyes, the humanity!
theme of human moral choice has traditionally been viewed in a completely different aspect: Shakespeare - to be or not to be, raskolnikovskoy - be a trembling creature or the right to have Gerasimovsky - or drown Mumu still there.The war is in this context are sidelined, if humanity sililos forget that trouble so many times happens to him.
Of course, this topic was raised in his famous literary works, of course, it was reflected in the film.However, it tried not to pay special attention so as not to indicate the absence of a person in it humanity.
Now this question is raised by many: the moral choice - essay exam or simply reasoning in the classroom.More and more are turning to it in writing dissertations and coursework linguists and psychologists.Increasingly, it reflects the whole of humanity.
Perhaps someday we will understand that the only correct solution is a life without war and justified a choice can only be called that does not warp our souls.We can hope that the bleeding stops grief of all mankind no longer held any one country.We can believe it.And we believe.That is our choice.
