To the credit of many visitors to websites, they are interested in not only the personal life of movie stars, but also problems of literacy."How to write" come "or" come "?"- A question that is often asked users of the web.Try to understand.
to argue about?
terms of elementary logic, no problem on this issue no.Both words - verbs in the infinitive form (infinitive), as answer to the question: "What to do?" Infinitive - is what defines the verb in the dictionary.So what is easier?Open the dictionary and check: come or arrive?
All modern dictionaries unanimous: the best option is to "come."But for some reason there was doubt, and that this verb is fierce debate?
turn to the classics.The play of Alexander Pushkin "The Stone Guest", 1948 edition of "Ask the statue tomorrow Donna Anna to come back later in the evening and be on the watch at the door." What is it?Star of Russian poetry did not know the spelling of the word "come" and known for its meticulous Soviet proofreaders did not correct the text before printing?
Leo Tolstoy: "We need to come to the state of the child" (from the reflections on religion)."You see, I came so I could come" (from private correspondence).These texts were published in the Soviet period.Is a mistake?Let us listen to experts
no error.For many years, the choice between the words "come" or "come" does not exist present the uniqueness and the second version was even more preferable.
Turning to the luminaries of the Russian language, living in the past century, can be seen as follows.In the dictionary, Vladimir Dahl's really no dilemma: come or arrive?As it is written in the publication are correct both.The Dictionary of Ephraim and spelling Ozhegova present only the verb "to come".At Ushakov we find the same option as the primary, but considered acceptable as writing "come" and "to come."As for the verb conjugations, along with the modern "come, come" allowed - marked "obsolete" - and the options "shall come, priydesh."
Such inconsistency in spelling can be explained by a variety of special forms of Russian language and traditions existing in it.Related to this, and a large number of interested in the problem: how to - to come or to come?Faced in old books or other sources with the option to "come", many still consider it to be true.
contraption?
Someone not to wrestle with the writing, it offers simply replace the controversial words of their synonyms: come, come, come.But, of course, such a recommendation may be considered only as a comic.Any word bears its meaning, and its replacement may be synonymous or do inappropriate or indigestible due to a number of representations.We can say "come to a consensus," but never consume this situation, the verb "to come".In principle, the expression "to come to a meeting," this alternative can be used, and the meaning of what it does not hurt.But I would like to see the reaction of a young girl whose lover (especially if it is not the military) would declare that asks her to come out on a date ...
And if so?
not save the situation, even the use of the closest in the sense of the infinitive "to come."Come - is the perfect form of the verb, which indicates a specific result of: regain consciousness, come to a stop.And to come - is an imperfect view, it does not necessarily presuppose the result.Coming to a stop - does not mean to be there, come to mind - not necessarily wake up.
Maybe it is not necessary to cheat?Is not it better just to remember how to spell?Come, according to the accepted rules in 1956 - the only currently valid version,
population against it!
Interestingly, even a concrete answer to this question does not prevent new doubts and even objections.Why have two options - to come and come - first selected it?In addition, there is a similar omitting the verb - "to go", but the words "yti" or "iyti" in the Russian language does not exist.There is a "d", and in other forms: come, come.Where is the logic in choosing the infinitive "to come"?
Many pay attention to the pronunciation of the word.In colloquial speech sound "th" is usually lost, often heard at all "to come" - why not make itself and in writing?
individual Internet users do not understand the logic of choice, even consider the option "come" typical tyranny of the officials from the education, receives the data rule.Who knows, maybe so.This version is the more interesting, if you look at the year of entry into force of the rules.1956 First: the country manages Khrushchev.Not only was it made in the years various discretionary decisions?
And linguists - for!
choice of the form to "come" is controversial not only for amateurs, but also for a number of qualified professionals.Yet part of the philologists consider this decision is justified.With reference to the Prutkov ("Behold the root!"), A specialist in internet simply offers a detailed analysis of these words.The infinitive "to come" in its various forms (go, go, left, etc.). Identify the root is very difficult.The overall significant part can be considered only "and", which can also be lowered (went, gone), or move to "second" (go, leave).For the Old Slavonic language, which belongs to the verb "go", such a situation is not uncommon.Analysis of the word "go" will give us the root of "and", infix "d", verb suffix "ti".From this point of view, the option to "come" quite logical "if" - prefix "d" - the root and the same suffix.
Are all satisfied with this answer?Even the author trying to tell and show how to write "go" how to dismantle other word forms of the verb, still do not forget to refer to the complex language processes and their results are difficult to explain.Maybe that's just the point?
About Russian language
network users, under the dispute "come" or "come", spelling words and many others has been questioned.Why, for example, we write "Bolshevik" and at the same time, "stupid", "kulak" when logically all 3 words must have the same suffix?Asker trying to argue.Like, version of "Bolshevik" founded by "Bolshevism," and not by "Bolshevik", and therefore not written with a "y" as "kulak."But the answer is not too convincing, because the word "Bolshevik", although present in dictionaries, in practice it is usually not used.Oh whatever noun formative we went, as an adjective usually applied the second option.
word "Bolshevik" and everything associated with it, is no longer relevant, and can not wrestle with their spelling.But how many in the Russian language other words, writing that makes thoroughly think!
How to write: "victory" or "defeated"?- Interests of the partners.And nothing!Such words do not exist!For the verb "win" in the 1st person singular future tense is simply no form.To achieve your goal - "'ll be able to win", "I can win."
«Not lozhte mirror on the desk" - the classic version of the error, which became the cause of the conflict in the wonderful film "We'll Live Till Monday".Two common misconceptions: "lay down" and "poklast."It is important to remember: the verb "to lay down" without set-top boxes do not exist.The correct option is "put."The same verb, in turn, is not used with prefixes;there can only be true to the word "put", "invest" and so forth.
As the imperative form of the verb "to go"?Well, certainly not "ehay" or "ehayte"!"Go," "come," "call in" - that apply.
About loanwords
If sometimes so difficult to determine the spelling of Russian words, what can be said about foreign terms?To abandon their use, as suggested by some zealous head, not worth it - a more expensive!Which is easier: to say "air-conditioning" or come up with some sort of new definition of "air-cleaner-cooler"?Somehow too hard!
So, you just need to remember.For example, a favorite coffee - espresso, espresso instead;from fast trains and drink different spelling.About
Leninist precepts
«Study, study and study again!" - Called once Ulyanov-Lenin, and the covenant of the main Bolshevik really should agree.Study - is the only way to make your writing and speech more or less literate.Wherever it turns out you need to get to the point.Where it is impossible - just remember.Learn grammar, finally, browse dictionaries.
The Internet is sometimes interested in and derivative verbs parsed us.Ask how to spell "prishol" or "come"?On this question once and answer awkward - the situation in detail versed in school lessons.Well, of course, I come!The letter "o" after the sizzling still possible in the case of a few nouns (seam burn), but in the case of verbal endings it can not be.Here, even the head of the spelling does not need to break enough to pick up a book and learn the rules.
Why?
But how important it is - to write correctly?It did without ratification whole nations and generations, and nothing!Communication on the Internet today reveals blatant ignorance, but that does not stop to talk to people and find common ground.And if they do not find it because of political or other differences, but not because of errors in the letter.
To some extent talking about the need for a nice and error free to express their thoughts is meaningless.Who feels the need to be literate, that is looking for any opportunity to improve their knowledge and add to the lexicon.To errors and poor syllable not interfere with life on earth, he is more live, not listening to any exhortations.
's just ... Educated people mistakes in another letter very hurt the eyes, and immediately lost respect for their author.Someone compares illiterate text dirty neck of its owner, for someone misspelled akin stains on clothes.Does anyone want to be known as a slut in the eyes of others?
